Monday, April 4, 2011

Obama to travel to Indy on Friday

President Obama travels to Indianapolis Friday to visit Allison Transmission, the White House announced today.

White House officials said the visit was part of his effort to cut oil imports and protect consumers from rising oil prices.

Allison Transmission is a leader in hybrid technology and the world’s largest manufacturer of fully-automatic transmissions for medium- and heavy-duty commercial vehicles, tactical military vehicles and hybrid-propulsion systems, White House officials said.

Last June, the firm announced a facility, which, when fully operational, will have the capacity to produce 20,000 commercial-duty hybrid propulsion systems annually, the White House said.

White House officials said when Obama was elected, the U.S. imported 11 million barrels of oil a day. Last week he announced a goal of cutting that figure by one-third by 2025.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Barack Obama: the softly-softly president

President Obama may be under attack from all quarters over Libya, but he knows what he’s doing, says Alex Spillius.

During their long and prickly battle for the 2008 Democratic nomination, Hillary Clinton taunted Barack Obama with a television advertisement in which a telephone ringing at 3am in the White House went unanswered. The question was: who did Americans want to pick up the phone? “Someone tested and ready to lead in a dangerous world?” as the doom-laden voiceover suggested – in other words someone such as the supposedly battle-ready Mrs Clinton? Or someone such as Barack Obama, who at that stage had been in the United States Senate for a mere three years?

When it came to the Libyan crisis, Mr Obama left the figurative phone ringing for a fortnight, and as the British and French clamoured for a muscular response, did not speak to David Cameron for a week. Only when Col Muammar Gaddafi’s armoured divisions began picking off opposition-held towns, and when the Arab League supported a no-fly zone, did he change his mind, and only then after Hillary Clinton – now, of course, overseeing the answering of the phones at the State Department – and Susan Rice, his ambassador to the United Nations, persuaded him that it would not be in his interests to have another Srebrenica on his hands.

Critics called this dithering, and it was. The bulk of Obama’s working life was spent teaching law at the University of Chicago – he rarely mentions this because it is politically unsexy. But when faced with a crisis he still reacts like a college professor, gathering as much data and listening to as many different viewpoints as possible before processing all that information through his high quality brain. Gut feelings are not a strong point, but that does not mean that on Libya he does not know what he is doing.

While European interventionists may be frustrated chiefly with his late arrival to the cause, criticism at home has come from every angle. Senators from both Left and Right wondered why Congress was not consulted and demanded a joint session where the president would explain the goals of the mission. Newt Gingrich, a former Speaker of the House who is seeking the Republican presidential nomination next year, called Obama a “spectator in chief instead of commander in chief”, who lacked the ability to lead the world. Mitt Romney, another potential rival, said Mr Obama lacked a foreign policy.

Some asked what the president was doing jetting off to Latin America for five days when the country was effectively going to war. As French, British and US jets (a running order the White House insisted on) prepared to attack the southern Mediterranean coast, Mr Obama and his family arrived in Brazil, with Michelle and the two girls clad in closely coordinated carnival-yellow outfits.

With Washington’s politicos and press corps demanding an explanation, he made only a short statement on Friday before leaving Washington – and before it dawned on the Beltway crowd that bombs were going to rain on Libya – and then took only one question on the military operation at a Monday press conference in Chile.

In many ways, his critics have missed the point. With the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan still active, the last impression this US president wants to give Americans is that they are at war on another front. That is why he avoided a sombre Oval Office address to the nation as the first missiles were launched into a dark far-away sky on the very day that Operation Iraqi Freedom commenced eight years ago. That is why he kept the press at arm’s length and made sure his family visited a Rio slum and the mountain-top statue of Christ the Redeemer.

“Obama is pursuing a subtle strategy that, contrary to the criticism, has been carefully thought out,” says Stefan Halper, a former senior official in four Republican administrations. “It will enable the Europeans to do what they want to do with American help, preserve our credibility and ensure we pull away from the cutting edge of this process.”

There are numerous causes for Washington’s reticence. The Pentagon is worried about cost and overstretch. The president is concerned about not wrecking what he sees as progress in repairing the Arab world’s trust in Washington. A humanitarian crisis in Libya is, moreover, much further from the US than from Europe.

There is also a keen awareness in the Obama administration, Mr Halper says, that the real worries in the Middle East are the kingdoms of Bahrain, where the US Fifth Fleet resides, and Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest supplier of oil.

“It is very present in people’s minds and there is a sense of keeping your powder dry. If we have to have a holding operation in Libya that prevents a slaughter and takes a long time for a rag-tag opposition to move Gaddafi out of office, then so be it.”

Norm Ornstein, a scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, says: “We are already at war in two Muslim nations and a third could not be contemplated. The delays from the White House may have come at a cost on the ground as Gaddafi made some gains, but would quick unilateral action have defeated him for sure?

“This was better than blundering into a conflict looking like a cowboy who only goes after Muslims. We will play a significant role in this but not one which allows al-Jazeera to show people burning US flags.”

And so we have had the extraordinary spectacle of the French and the Arab League being more hawkish than the world’s sole superpower. Within a few days the Americans are determined to hand over command of the operation to Nato or another country. That, of course, brings its own problems, as the bickering between Nato partners over the precise aim of the mission has shown. But what should not be missed here is that far from lacking a foreign policy for the US, Obama is changing it.

The multilateralism he seeks against Libya is not the fig-leafed coalition of the willing that went to war in Iraq, where, as Mr Ornstein puts it, “every other country apart from a few sent three or four soldiers”. Obama foresees an operation against Libya with an American logistical spine and a British or French, or even Arab face. He is happy to pick up the tab, but does not want to stay for dinner.

His plan is consistent with his approach to date of restoring US standing after the Bush era, promoting US economic interests given the nation’s shrinking share of the global pie, and avoiding conflict without looking weak – hence his decision to redouble efforts in Afghanistan. This may be too nuanced, or too vague, to be called an Obama doctrine. But as long as he sits in the White House, US allies will have to get used to the fact that while they can turn to America in a crisis, they may not receive the response they expect, especially when they themselves are in hawkish mood on any given issue.

“Obama is intuitively a multilateralist and he doesn’t seem to believe that the US has any innate cultural superiority over other countries,” says David Rothkopf of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “The problem is he is also very pragmatic, politically self-interested, and as narcissistic as any political leader, which means he wants all events to redound to his benefit personally.”

If Obama is not free of excessive personal regard, neither is he shy of using America’s clout when it suits him. He delivered a slap on the wrist to Brazil for irritating him over Iran by refusing to support its bid for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council. He hesitated little about using the US veto in the same forum against a resolution condemning Israeli settlements.

“The president knows how powerful the US is,” Mr Rothkopf says. “He is just fairly uncomfortable about using US military power.”

That, for all of us, may take some getting used to. Europeans wanted an anti-Bush figure. This is what they have got.

Monday, March 7, 2011

Obama issues disaster declaration for Mass. storms

President Barack Obama has issued a major disaster declaration for Massachusetts to help the state rebuild following January's severe winter storms.

Gov. Deval Patrick asked for the declaration in the wake of the winter pounding the state took on Jan. 11 and 12.

The storms spread heavy snow and ice across Massachusetts, shutting down roads, closing schools and businesses and leaving thousands without power.

Sen. John Kerry hailed the declaration Monday.

Kerry said that while most of the snow and ice from the storms has melted away, people are still hurting from the damage left behind. He said people missed work, homes lost power and businesses had to close their doors, losing valuable revenue.

Obama issued the disaster declaration Monday afternoon.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Obama touts tech agenda in Oregon

President Barack Obama paid a quick West Coast sales call for his education and high-tech agenda, dining with industry royalty at a private meeting in Silicon Valley before touring a state-of-the-art semiconductor plant in Oregon.

After visiting with a group of science fair students and peering at the image of atoms seen through an electron magnoscope, Obama renewed the theme sounded in his State of the Union address, with a nod toward his recent focus on deficit reduction.

"Even as we have to live within our means, we can't sacrifice investments in our future," Obama told several hundred guests and employees gathered at Intel Corp.'s suburban Portland, Ore., campus Friday. "If we want the next technological breakthrough that leads to the next Intel to happen here in the United States — not in China, not in Germany — then we have to invest in America's research and technology, in the work of our scientists and engineers."

Obama has pushed for increased spending on education, high-speed Internet, high-speed rail and green technologies — even as other federal programs are slashed or frozen — as a way to create jobs and better position the U.S. for competition in an increasingly globalized economy. Republicans call "investment" a euphemism for expanding the size and heft of government and have called for drastic budget cuts.

Obama found a friendly audience in Oregon, a Democratic stronghold, and an unlikely host in Intel Chief Executive Paul Otellini, who contributed to Obama's Republican opponent, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, in 2008 and has been critical of the president's economic and health care policies.

The relationship has thawed as Obama endorsed an extension of the research and development tax credit — a legislative priority forIntel and other tech firms — and taken other steps to reach out to business leaders. On Friday, Obama named Otellini to his Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, an economic advisory group.

Otellini, for his part, announced after the tour that Intel would build a $5 billion manufacturing facility in the Phoenix suburb of Chandler. The Arizona facility will create thousands of new jobs and will be the most advanced high-volume semiconductor factory in the world, he said.

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, White House press secretary Jay Carney acknowledged Otellini's past criticism. "The president wants to hear from a lot of different voices," Carney said en route to Portland, Obama's only other West Coast appearance Friday.

"The point is not to collect people who agree with him on every issue and every policy decision he's made," Carney said, "but to create an environment, a council ... where ideas, good ideas, can be generated for going forward on job creation."

Before heading to Oregon, Obama dined Thursday night at the Woodside, Calif., home of venture capitalist John Doerr, a major Democratic donor. The private meeting included several marquee names from the tech industry, including Apple Inc. Chief Executive Steve Jobs, Google Inc. CEO Eric Schmidt, Facebook Inc. founder Mark Zuckerberg and Yahoo Inc. CEO Carol Bartz.

Carney said the president and business leaders discussed Obama's proposals to spur investment and hiring, as well as ways to encourage children to study math, science and engineering.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Geithner Tells Obama Debt Expense to Rise to Record

Barack Obama may lose the advantage of low borrowing costs as the U.S. Treasury Department says what it pays to service the national debt is poised to triple amid record budget deficits.

Interest expense will rise to 3.1 percent of gross domestic product by 2016, from 1.3 percent in 2010 with the government forecast to run cumulative deficits of more than $4 trillion through the end of 2015, according to page 23 of a 24-page presentation made to a 13-member committee of bond dealers and investors that meet quarterly with Treasury officials.

While some of the lowest borrowing costs on record have helped the economy recover from its worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, bond yields are now rising as growth resumes. Net interest expense will triple to an all-time high of $554 billion in 2015 from $185 billion in 2010, according to the Obama administration's adjusted 2011 budget.

"It's a slow train wreck coming and we all know it's going to happen," said Bret Barker, an interest-rate analyst at Los Angeles-based TCW Group Inc., which manages about $115 billion in assets. "It's just a question of whether we want to deal with it. There are huge structural changes that have to go on with this economy."

The amount of marketable U.S. government debt outstanding has risen to $8.96 trillion from $5.8 trillion at the end of 2008, according to the Treasury Department. Debt-service costs will climb to 82 percent of the $757 billion shortfall projected for 2016 from about 12 percent in last year's deficit, according to the budget projections.

Budget Proposal

That compares with 69 percent for Portugal, whose bonds have plummeted on speculation it may need to be bailed out by the European Union and International Monetary Fund.

Forecasts of higher interest expenses raises the pressure on Obama to plan for trimming the deficit. The President, who has called for a five-year freeze on discretionary spending other than national security, is scheduled to release his proposed fiscal 2012 budget today as his administration and Congress negotiate boosting the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling.

"If government debt and deficits were actually to grow at the pace envisioned, the economic and financial effects would be severe," Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke told the House Budget Committee Feb. 9. "Sustained high rates of government borrowing would both drain funds away from private investment and increase our debt to foreigners, with adverse long-run effects on U.S. output, incomes, and standards of living."

Yield Forecasts

Treasuries lost 2.67 percent last quarter, even after reinvested interest, and are down 1.54 percent this year, Bank of America Merrill Lynch index data show. Yields rose last week to an average of 2.19 percent for all maturities from 2010's low of 1.30 percent on Nov. 4.

The yield on benchmark 10-year Treasury note will climb to 4.25 by the end of the second quarter of 2012, from 3.63 percent last week, according to the median estimate of 51 economists and strategists surveyed by Bloomberg News. The rate was 3.64 percent as of 2:08 p.m. today in Tokyo. The economy will grow 3.2 percent in 2011, the fastest pace since 2004, according to another poll.

"People are starting to come to the conclusion that you've got a self-sustaining recovery going on here," said Thomas Girard who helps manage $133 billion in fixed income at New York Life Investment Management in New York. "When interest rates start to go back up because of the normal business cycle, debt service costs have the potential to just skyrocket. Every day that we don't address this in a meaningful way it gets more and more dangerous."

'Kind of Disruption'

While yields on the benchmark 10-year note are up, they remain below the average of 4.14 percent over the past decade as Europe's debt crisis bolsters investor demand for safer assets, Bank of America Merrill Lynch index data show.

"The market is still giving the U.S. government the benefit of the doubt," said Eric Pellicciaro, New York-based head of global rates investments at BlackRock Inc., which manages about $3.56 trillion in assets. "What we're concerned with is whether the budget will only be corrected after the market has tested them. Will we need some kind of disruption within the bond market before they'll actually do anything."

Still, U.S. spending on debt service accounts for 1.7 percent of its GDP compared with 2.5 percent for Germany, 2.6 percent for the United Kingdom and a median of 1.2 percent for AAA rated sovereign issuers, according to a study by Standard & Poor's published Dec. 24. Among AA rated nations, China's ratio is 0.4 percent, while Japan's is 2.9 percent, and for BBB rated countries, Mexico devotes 1.7 percent of its output to debt service and Brazil 5.2 percent, the report shows.

Auction Demand

Demand for Treasuries remains close to record levels at government debt auctions. Investors bid $3.04 for each dollar of bonds sold in the government's $178 billion of auctions last month, the most since September, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Indirect bidders, a group that includes foreign central banks, bought a record 71 percent, or $17 billion of the $24 billion in 10-year notes offered on Feb. 9.

Foreign holdings of Treasuries have increased 18 percent to $4.35 trillion through November. China, the largest overseas holder, has increased its stake by 0.1 percent to $895.6 billion, and Japan, the second largest, boosted its by 14.6 percent to $877.2 billion.

'Killing Itself'

"China cannot dump Treasuries without killing itself," said Michael Cheah, who oversees $2 billion in bonds at SunAmerica Asset Management in Jersey City, New Jersey. "They're holding Treasuries as a means to an end," said Cheah, who worked at the Singapore Monetary Authority from 1982 through 1999, and now teaches finance classes at New York University and at Chinese universities. "It's part of what's needed to promote exports."

At least some of the increase in interest expense is related to an effort by the Treasury to extend the average maturity of its debt when rates are relatively low by selling more long-term bonds, which have higher yields than short-term notes. The average life of the U.S. debt is 59 months, up from 49.4 months in March 2009. That was the lowest since 1984.

The U.S. produced four budget surpluses from 1998 through 2001, the first since 1969, as the expanding economy, declining rates and a boom in stock prices combined to swell tax receipts.

Tax cuts in 2001 and 2003, the strain of the Sept. 11 terror attacks, the cost of funding wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the collapse in home prices and the subsequent recession and financial crisis has led to the three largest deficits in dollar terms on record, totaling $3.17 trillion the past three years.

'Demonstrates Confidence'

The U.S. needs to manage its spending decisions "in a way that demonstrates confidence to investors so we can bring down our long-term fiscal deficits, because if we don't do that, it's going to hurt future growth," Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said in Washington on Feb. 9.

The Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee, which includes representatives from firms ranging from Goldman Sachs Group Inc. to Soros Fund Management LLC, expressed concern in the Feb. 1 report that the U.S. is exposing itself to the risk that demand erodes unless it cultivates more domestic demand.

"A more diversified debt holder base would prepare the Treasury for a potential decline in foreign participation," the report said.

Foreign investors held 49.7 percent of the $8.75 trillion of public Treasury debt outstanding as of November, down from as high as 55.7 percent in April 2008 after the collapse of Bear Stearns Cos., according to Treasury data.

Potential Demand

The committee projects there may be $2.4 trillion in latent demand for Treasuries from banks, insurance companies and pension funds as well as individual investors. New securities with maturities as long as 100 years, as well as callable Treasuries or bonds whose principal is linked to the growth of the economy might entice potential lenders, the report said.

"They are opening up a can of worms with the idea of all these other instruments," said Tom di Galoma, head of U.S. rates trading at Guggenheim Partners LLC, a New York-based brokerage for institutional investors. "They should try to keep the Treasury issuance as simple as possible. The more issuance you have in particular issue, the more people will trade them -- whether it be domestic or foreign investors."

White House Budget Director Jacob Lew said the Obama administration's 2012 budget would save $1.1 trillion over the next 10 years by cutting programs to rein in a deficit that may reach a record $1.5 trillion this year.

"We have to start living within our means," Lew said yesterday on CNN's "State of the Union" program.

Still, about $4.5 trillion, or 63 percent of the $7.2 trillion in public Treasury coupon debt, needs to be refinanced by 2016. That gives the government a narrowing window as growing interest expense will curtail its ability to spend.

"There is roll-over risk," said James Caron, head of U.S. interest-rate strategy at Morgan Stanley in New York, one of 20 primary dealers that trade with the Fed. "It's a vicious cycle."

Monday, February 7, 2011

Obama appoints Pawlenty's pastor

President Obama has named Tim Pawlenty’s pastor, Leith Anderson, who is also the president of the National Association of Evangelicals, to his council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.

Anderson has been a senior pastor at Wooddale Church in Minnesota, one of the largest evangelical churches in the country, since 1977. He is known as a moderate evangelical leader and since taking the helm of the NAE in 2006 has steered the organization toward more moderate political engagement.

They issued statements of support for the START Treaty ratification last year, supported Obama’s push for comprehensive immigration reform and the DREAM Act, and issued a report on 18 issues in which NAE and Obama concur.

As Pawlenty seemingly prepares to launch a bid against Obama in 2012, he will likely be up against another evangelical candidate in the Republican primaries, Mike Huckabee. Meanwhile, Obama has continuously fought against widespread misconceptions that he is not a Christian.

“Every day I read a poll [about Obama’s religion] I think it’s odd,” Anderson told POLITICO last year, coming to Obama’s defense. “I read all these polls and my mind always flashes back to Jay Leno and ‘Jaywalking,’” referring to the comedian’s routine that pokes fun at Americans’ ignorance of seemingly basic facts.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Obama to sign nuclear treaty documents Wednesday

President Barack Obama is pushing a key foreign policy goal, a nuclear arms treaty with Russia, closer to completion. 

He was signing documents Wednesday for the New START treaty, a cornerstone of U.S. efforts to "reset" ties with Russia. 

The agreement limits each country to 1,550 strategic warheads, down from 2,200. It also re-establishes a monitoring system that ended in December 2009 with the expiration of an earlier arms deal.

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev (dih-MEE'-tree med-VYEH'-dyev) signed the papers last week after the treaty cleared parliament. The U.S. Senate approved the pact in late December after Obama lobbied hard for passage. 

Ratification becomes final when both sides exchange the signed papers. 

Obama is scheduled to sign the documents in the Oval Office in the presence of news photographers only.