A Republican lawmaker working on budgetary issues told "Fox News 
Sunday" that he believes President Barack Obama wants to go over the 
so-called fiscal cliff at the end of the year, and may not be 
negotiating in good faith.
Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), the chairman of the Republican policy 
committee, told Fox's Chris Wallace that he expects the U.S. will go 
over the cliff.
"I believe the president is eager to go over the cliff for political 
purposes," Barrasso said. "I think he sees a political victory at the 
bottom of the cliff: He gets all this additional tax revenue for new 
programs, he gets to cut the military, which Democrats have been calling
 for for years, and he gets to blame Republicans for it."
For the past week,
 Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner worked to pass what he 
called Plan B, a tax deal that had no chance of receiving presidential 
approval, in an attempt to twist Obama's arm ahead of the end of the 
year, when the Bush tax cuts expire.
That plan failed when Boehner could not wrangle enough votes from the more conservative elements of his caucus, leaving Obama to plead with
 House Republicans late on Friday to sign off on at least a limited 
package of tax cuts for the middle class, before everyone sees their 
taxes rise.
Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), the chairman of the Senate Finance 
Committee and who appeared on the show as the Democratic counterpoint, 
responded that responsibility for making a deal lies with more than just
 the president, and that Congress needs to show more willingness to meet
 Obama halfway.
"We only have nine days left here," Conrad said. "When are we going to get serious about actual solutions?"
Despite the amplified rhetoric about a fiscal "cliff" that could 
possibly doom the American economy, few in Washington seem to be 
treating the imminent tax hikes as a true doomsday. Many politicians are
 on holiday this weekend, and the Sunday shows -- normally a major 
battleground for political disputes of this sort -- were populated 
largely with bit players in the debate.
And as The Huffington Post's Ryan Grim reported Saturday, there are no signs that federal agencies
 are preparing any major changes ahead of the deadline, suggesting they 
do not anticipate any direct fallout from the sequestration that goes 
into effect at the end of the year.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment